SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)
INTC 39.50-3.1%3:59 PM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: wanna_bmw who wrote (142732)9/4/2001 8:13:26 PM
From: Win Smith  Read Replies (1) of 186894
 
The P4 isn't slow, but it's fat. In the near term, anybody who'd pay $600 for the privilege of running a 2ghz P4, plus being saddled with soon to be obsolete Rambus memory, or else going with Intel's lame SDRAM 845, for a system that's a performance wash with a $105 1.4 ghz Athlon on a $60 mobo is not being economically rational. But economics in the conventional sense isn't what's at work here. If Intel were operating like a conventional company in a competitive marketplace, they'd be thrilled to have Via's DDR P4 chipset out there. That's not the way Intel operates, though.

Of course, Intel is no doubt shoveling the 2ghz P4 into Mikey Dell's hands at a price somewhat below $600, maybe $300, maybe $200.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News