SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : QQQ - Nasdaq 100 Trust
QQQ 632.08+0.5%Nov 3 4:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: pass pass who wrote (673)9/6/2001 10:11:55 PM
From: Savant  Read Replies (1) of 840
 
I'm much more in favor of SS partial privatization at these market levels, than I was at the higher levels when earlier proposed. Should the markets go still lower, my approval rating would increase proportionally. (not that anyone cares what I think).
There should be a sliding scale, when the markets are over X valuation, no one can put their SS monies at risk, when lower, they can input higher proportions...just a thought. Along the 'buy low, sell high' line of thinking.
Perhaps the monies could be put into a money market holding fund, that could be transfered to an index, when the valuations are more favorable, and again into when the markets are over that X valuation or when people are approaching withdrawal age.
Coupled with the sliding scale, I would rather see index investing than into individual companies or bonds......I take note that a number of the former AAAs, are rated much lower now. The indices are lower, but the sliding scale would have precluded some of the high market burn factor.
Best, Savant
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext