it's hard to imagine any self-respecting
deity setting up a system that metes out healing based on the efforts of prayers.
That sort of statement makes several assumptions.
First, that we are even capable of understanding what and why a deity might do. I don't think my dogs are capable of understanding why I leve them alone shut up in their kennels five mornings in a row and come home just in time to feed them dinner those five days, but on two other days stay home most of the day and am available to play with them a lot more, but sometimes stay home three days in a row and then go away during the day for the next four days, etc. If my dogs, who live with me and see me and watch me every day and are also physical beings like I am can't understand me, why on earth (or off earth) should we think we can understand the rationales of a deity or why he/she/it does what he/she/it does?
Second, that even if we were able to understand fully, why should a deity follow our rules or ideas for what is appropriate or inappropriate to do? It is, IMO, the height of arrogance for us to argue, either explicitly or, as I think you do, implicitly, that deities have to comply with our notions of right and wrong, good and bad, justice and injustice. In other words, what does whether a deity is self-respecting or not have to do with our rules for ourselves?
There are more problems with that statement, but I'll let these two do for now while I go make lunch. |
