International Precious Metals (IPMCF) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Rock Doctor who wrote (12772)	6/20/1997 7:37:00 PM
From: Proton	of 35569

Re: What's at Stake One member of the AGM audience asked a question concerning the Arizona Department of Mines. Mr. Doyle indicated that IPM would have no comment, as the matter is in litigation. Mr. Furlong then directed attention to Sam Shaw. Dr. Shaw reminded that audience that, before he was in the employ of IPM, in his role as a auditor for BD, he personally pulled the dirt sample, he personaly prepared and processed it, he personally created the slides on which to perform analysis, and he personally got the results claimed by IPM. If I understood the story as it was related to me by an AGM attendee, Dr. Shaw staked his word, his reputation, and his career (and perhaps more) on those utterances. Not just that he believes the numbers, but that he reproduced the results, personally. It was considered a key moment of the AGM Pý Information in this posting has come from sources believed to be reliable, but no assurance is given for its accuracy.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next