SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Ashton Technology (ASTN)

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Capitalizer who started this subject9/8/2001 12:10:42 PM
From: Zebra 365   of 4443
 
Send the Message

This is a repeat, so those that have seen it before can skip it. I also apologize for posting something about ASTN on what has obviously become the "everyone look at Mary" board.

I think that everyone should make their own decision on the proxy. But they need to be very clear what it is that they are voting for.

If you vote "yes" on question 3, you are saying that it is all right for the company to issue an unlimited number of shares to Jameson Drive for financing $15 million.

If you vote "no" on question 3, you are not preventing the dilution of your interest by shares to be issued to Jameson Drive. You are not preventing the company from accessing cash. Shares will still be issued to Jameson in exchange for cash, but cannot equal or exceed 20% of the outstanding shares. In other words you are limiting the dilution to 20% which is still another 6.6 million shares. I think that, from Jameson's point of view, there is more incentive to keep the price up than if they expect an unlimited number of shares. Give RGC and Jameson both an unlimited number of shares and it becomes a shorting game where the one that shorts the most, first, wins.

If the company needs more dilution than that (we're probably toast then anyway) they can always call a special meeting and ask again. I know that costs money but I think it is worth it.

Finally, do not assume that you are without clout. Of course the BOD will vote their shares as a block but look at the annual report, they are sitting on a lot of options, and you can't vote options.

Only about 10% of shares actually ever get voted, and they usually go with management. I admit that, the thing will likely get passed even if most reading this vote "no" on number three. But if we vote "no" on number three, it may spur the BOD to get things rolling quicker because of the fear of retaliation by a large number of unhappy shareholders.

Remember, if this ramp up in volume were happening in January of 2000, we would have been looking at a $25 stock instead of a 60 cent one.

Send the message.

Zebra
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext