SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Nokia (NOK)
NOK 6.480-0.2%Jan 9 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: 49thMIMOMander who wrote (15011)9/8/2001 5:31:30 PM
From: carranza2  Read Replies (4) of 34857
 
Streaming football goals in Europe? LOL. World Cup? Got to go Korea!!

The Register's irreverent views on the recent Vodaphone press foibles:

theregister.co.uk

Vodafone's 3G phones won't provide consumers with one of the main selling points of the next-generation technology - video - because its network will not be able to support the speeds required.

In a FT story today, it was revealed Vodafone is only guaranteeing 64Kbps on its 3G phones - not enough for streaming video. As such Vodafone doesn't even meet the minimum standards required for 3G networks as set by the International Telecommunication Union - which state "minimum 144 kbit/s in all radio environments and 2 Mbit/s in low-mobility and indoor environments".

The low-speed also puts a question mark over services like video clips of football goals - something that operators have been touting as a killer app - due to the length of time you would have to wait for the clip to appear.

Unsurprisingly, Vodafone has gone into mass denial mode. It told the Press Association this morning: "We will deliver 3G exactly according to standard. The network will have the capability to serve customers at speed of up to 384 kilobit per second."

As ever, the devil's in the exact wording. Yes, Vodafone will be able to offer 384Kbps but to do so you will have to be sitting either right next to a 3G mast or in the middle of several of them. Vodafone can only guarantee a 64Kbps service because it hasn't installed enough new masts to up the speed across the whole service.

The FT reporter Dan Roberts, told us he stood by the story and that Vodafone had confirmed all the details when he called the company last night. It looks as though Vodafone is going for damage limitation.

We received an explicit denial: "The FT article is totally inaccurate. We will be offering a network that offers between 64 and 384Kbps," said John Earl of Vodafone Investor Relations. Will there be video streaming at launch? "There will be video streaming several years down the line." And video clips at launch? "There will be video clips at launch but they may be rudimentary at the start. You are going to get rudimentary services at the start but they will improve as we continue to build the network."

Isn't there a risk of a WAP re-run where people sign-up expecting one thing and get nothing like it in return? "We never said that these sort of services would be offered at launch." Maybe. We'll have a trawl of our archives to see if we can disprove this. It will also be interesting to see what other operators are planning to offer from launch. Of course the question would be: what's the bloody point in having a 3G phone if all it does is offer WAP at a faster speed?

Vodafone has spent around £13 billion on 10 licences for 3G phones across Europe. The huge cost - as with all the other European operators - has caused heavy debt problems and hacked into share prices. Everyone is already extremely jittery that 3G won't be able to pay for itself, especially considering the number of networks delays.

Now with the news that a 3G service from a main player in the market won't even offer one of its main sales points, more comparisons with the over-hyped and enormously unsuccessful WAP service appear inevitable. ®

Related Link
ITU standards

___________________________________________________________




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Uefa rules streaming video offside
By John Leyden
Posted: 07/09/2001 at 17:28 GMT

European football governing body Uefa is to provide live audio-streaming reports and comprehensive results coverage for important games on its website.

But Uefa.com will offer a selection of video clips only. It has no interest in showing the time-delayed broadcast of games (introduced this season by English Premiership clubs). Neither delivery mechanism interferes with the rights of terrestrial broadcasters.

Alexandre Fourtoy, chief executive of Uefa.com, told The Register that the "technology was not yet ready" for live streaming video because the user experience of pictures in a little Window fails to deliver what football fans look for in coverage of games.

Uefa.com wants to become Europe's Largest football portal. It will offer comprehensive coverage of all Uefa competitions, including the Uefa Champions League, Uefa Cup, youth and women's competitions. Competition coverage will include live audio streaming of matches, audio round up shows, video clips of footage, photo galleries, match reports and news of the competitions.

Fans will have free access to live audio-streaming reports of Champions' League games. Services providing by the site are free and designed to fulfil Uefa's role of promoting football in the 51 member countries.

However future development of the site may involve the introduction of premium services for targeted coverage along the lines of fee-based services available offline today, Fourtoy told us.

Uefa.com site received more than 1.5 million page views and nearly a quarter of a million visits when it provided live video and audio coverage of the Uefa Champions League draw on August 23.

The site runs IIS 5 on a Windows 2000 platform. Uefa.com has signed a two-year hosting deal with Verio, which will replicate the content of the site over 110 global data centres to provide high availability and resilience. ®

theregister.co.uk
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext