SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : WILL COCA-COLA ALWAYS GO UP?
KO 69.87-0.3%Dec 26 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Peter Longerich who started this subject9/8/2001 5:45:18 PM
From: kendall harmon  Read Replies (1) of 1462
 
Coke criticized over link to Potter movie

news from Atlanta

Scott Leith - Staff
Saturday, September 8, 2001

A consumer advocacy group that once targeted Chinese food and buttered popcorn is going after Coca-Cola.

Next Wednesday, the Center for Science in the Public Interest will launch a Web site criticizing Coke's sponsorship of the upcoming "Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone" movie.

The group claims Coke is using a beloved children's literary character to sell junk food.

Coke spokesman Bill Marks disputed that accusation, saying the company is using Harry Potter partly as a way to promote reading among kids.

Coca-Cola does plan to use Potter to promote Coke Classic, but other brands are involved as well: Minute Maid and Hi-C.

"To characterize Coca-Cola's sponsorship of Harry Potter and the magic of reading as inappropriate --- and infer a connection with the health and wellness of children --- simply misses the point for the sake of sensationalism," Marks said.

Michael Jacobson, executive director of the Center for Science in the Public Interest, said Wednesday will mark the launch of www.saveharry.com.

"Harry Potter is loved by tens of millions of children and adults worldwide," Jacobson said. "Coke is turning it into another piece of our commercialized culture."

CSPI has been adept at gaining publicity, but the group was also a key player in pushing the Nutrition Labeling and Education Act of 1990.

This new round of criticism is a polar opposite from others who claim Coke's Harry Potter sponsorship won't do enough to boost sales.

Some financial analysts believe the marketing venture is more of a feel-good promotion than a means of increasing volume.

accessatlanta.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext