SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)
INTC 37.48+3.4%2:37 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (143192)9/10/2001 12:45:04 AM
From: THE WATSONYOUTH  Read Replies (1) of 186894
 
It's the same reason why an 8-way Xeon system from HP (or Dell, or Compaq, or whomever) will cost less. Itanium will be higher volume than POWER4.

Well if Intel charges OEMs $1.5K for Itanium chips in volume, what do you think it costs IBM to produce Power4 chips. If it is less than $1.5K, then just where does this
cost advantage lie? In the chipsets? Intel marks them up as well. If IBM wants to compete on a cost basis... they can, especially if they know they will get sufficient income from softeware/middleware/ and services on those accounts. In such a scenario, Intel would need to sell Itanium at near cost to make Itanium systems more attractive from a cost basis. It comes down to what margin level is acceptable. It may come down to selling the hardware at near cost in order to keep the more profitable part of the business. I don't know what route IBM will take. But their options are open.

THE WATSONYOUTH
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext