RH sez: "We can each type all day in anger pro or con about the terrorists, but shouldn't we all also work to continue to define gold Vs money supply? "
As Donald Rumsfeld just posited live: "I'm from the old school," he said. "That is, if you cock it, you throw it. And you don't talk about it much. You just go about your business and get it done."
So you are in denial about the upcoming ramifications of yesterday's cowardly attack...that's fine. You've been a flamin' hawk for months, now you see what you feared materialize and that you've warned about and taken more than your share of b/s about from the bleeding hearts on here. NOW you're buried in website searches and archane historical money supply data rabbit trails.. Hey, man, if it works... I know that if your doorbell rings and your countrymen and women are on your stoop, you've got your boots on and your carbine ready.
RE: your comment about continuing to define gold vs. money supply...Nope...it lost all relevance about 30 years ago when we cut loose from the "gold standard" officially.
Not interested anymore. Our phony fiat is just that. And discussing how much paper it takes to light an Islamic terriorist is just an exercise in fantasy goldbuginess.
When you return to your ability to cope with your feelings, check in...otherwise, I'll see you when you're good and ready.
BTW, got that tranny situation back in hand now. Gotta run. |
