International Precious Metals (IPMCF) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (12834)	6/21/1997 12:08:00 PM
From: Larry Brubaker	of 35569

Zeev: What I think is new: We had been given hints about a refiner before. We weren't told who it was and that they verified IPM's results. We didn't know they have a replicable fire assay. There was lingering uncertainty about BD being relegated to a new role of environmental consultant, because they weren't coming up with the goods on the audit. This has been cleared up. We didn't have a time frame for the third party audit. I agree I would like to see this enumerated in an official company press release. But as far as morning after selling, it won't be coming from me.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next