An Eye for an Eye Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : An Eye for an Eye

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: LTK007 who wrote (122)	9/13/2001 5:54:44 AM
From: Moominoid	Read Replies (3) of 505

I never understood why they didn't go for Baghdad in the Gulf War. They could have withdrawn soon after don't need to occupy Iraq forever. In the present case we should note that the Taliban's sponsors Pakistan have nuclear weapons - talk of nuclear strikes in Afghanistan (which would be pretty pointless) should take this into account. By the way the Australian Foreign Minister said it was an "act of war" against Australia too as 90 Australians are still missing or already confirmed dead. NATO is invoking the attack against one is an attack against all clause as well.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next