SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 214.87-0.1%Dec 23 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: hmaly who wrote (55121)9/14/2001 12:10:54 AM
From: PetzRead Replies (4) of 275872
 
One thought on the demise of the nuclear power industry is that whoever is left should do the following:

Design and propose constuction of cookie-cutter small--to-medium-size nuclear power plants. Kind of like Intel's copy-exactly policy.

Every plant would be exactly the same, or nearly so. The economy of scale would occur, not because huge plants were designed, but because each smaller plant built was exactly identical.

If this was done, I believe regulatory appoval would be almost automatic for copies 2, 3, 4,... Perhaps GE or whoever last built a plant in the US could get pre-approval from a state like California that, if the plants were identical, the licensing and regulatory approvals for the 2nd, 3rd, 4th plants would be streamlined.

The disadvantage of copy-exactly in the semiconductor industry -- that it doesn't allow for "improvements" in the copies of the original design, in an industry where improvements occur at a rapid pace -- probably doesn't apply in the nuclear power industry because the technology has plateau-ed and is not evolving quickly anymore.

I never understood why every nuclear power plant ever designed seems to be unique.

Petz
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext