SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : High Tolerance Plasticity

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Razorbak who wrote (7957)9/16/2001 12:34:33 AM
From: RWS  Read Replies (1) of 23153
 
Razor,

There's no argument that the terrorist network has to be wiped out. That is a tactical issue.

I'm trying to address, I guess not too clearly, the strategic issue of purpose of foreign and defense policy and the deployment of forces. Yes, we don't know if this barbaric massacre could have been prevented even if we had taken all possible precautions. No, we did not take all possible precautions. As a matter of fact we took little additional precaution. The Lockerbie families have been begging and pleading for us to upgrade security, as well as the official commission, to no avail. Obviously now, we do have the money and the personnel to protect us to a much higher degree than previously. Yes, we do have the money for sky marshalls, now.

Bush gave Sharon the green light and got lots of warnings from our Arab friends (clients?). Did the Bush administration warn the American people about the increased threat assessments from CIA? No, they were too busy selling the Star Wars boondoggle. Colin Powell was given a back seat. Clinton was not dealing with the terrorist problem either, but he was trying to make progress with the Israel/Palestine conflict, which is essential to solving the whole knot of problems in the region.

Regards,

RWS
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext