Gold Price Monitor Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor

GDXJ 87.56

-4.9%

4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Stephen O who wrote (76647)	9/16/2001 1:08:25 PM
From: Enigma	Read Replies (1) of 116752

<<Assist us or be obliterated>> - sheer rubbish and I expect you know it - have you read that they have demanded billions in aid ($300 billion?) and help to solve the boundary dispute with India over Kasmere. 'Rag' hardly fits the Independant or Guardian, 'appeasement'is a convenient label for an opinion which doesn't fit your own. I don't know your nationality so I won't enquire whether your country favoured appeasemnt at the time of Munich - but I would guess that that is a stone that had better be left unturned? One country was overwhelmingly isolationist and therefore appeasing. It's conveniently forgotten that in Britain appeasment had overwhelming support - Churchill had few allies - but at least in Britain the debate had real meaning as they were in the front line. With 20/20 vision everyone is against appeasement but Churchill was one of the very few who was actually against it during the German re-armament. I'm wondering about the following scenario - what happens if Afghan hands over Bin Laden within 3 days - who will the US attack then? All of this energy and expectation surely has to be satisfied?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next