The Justa and Lars Honors Bob Brinker Investment Club Thread Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : The Justa and Lars Honors Bob Brinker Investment Club Thread

VTI 329.34

-1.1%

Nov 6 4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Boca_PETE who wrote (1436)	9/16/2001 9:21:39 PM
From: Justa Werkenstiff	Read Replies (2) of 10065

Pete: Standard insurance policy has a definition of an act of war which would not seem to cover Bin Laden. I don't think that argument will wash in court under standard language of the general commercial policy. George W. may view it as an act of war but a proper policy interpretation, in general, will view it as a covered peril unless excepted by another clause, i.e., terrorisim. This would be the exception and not the rule as the underwriter would most likely have to attach a specific rider to get that exclusion. The homeowner and general commercial policy generally provides protection against vandalism and malicious mischief.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next