SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)
INTC 41.41+2.2%Dec 5 9:30 AM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Elmer who wrote (143574)9/17/2001 4:00:30 PM
From: Jim McMannis  Read Replies (3) of 186894
 
RE:"By your reasoning we can only assume that Intel has no idea what it is doing and was simply duped into signing a licensing agreement and paying fees. If only they had consulted you they would have known none of this was necessary."

It you weren't such an Intel apologist I would ask you if you think Intel really had the choices they wanted or are they still just trying to make the best out of a bad situation?

RE:"BTW, seeing as you know everything, just what do you think this agreement obligates Intel to do?"

Oh sure, the spin will come...but tell me why Intel needs an agreement to bind them to Rambus...support Rambus?
Seems Rambus was in the weaker position but had some legal clout.
Of course, there is only ancedotal evidence of this for now.

So answer my question? Why does Intel even need an agreement to use Rambus? Rambus should be begging and holding their breathe that Intel will use their technology.

Jim
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News