SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Triffin's Market Diary

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Triffin who wrote (176)9/17/2001 9:04:44 PM
From: Triffin  Read Replies (1) of 869
 
BC: LOST LUGGAGE

Giving "lost luggage" a whole new meaning

by Deroy Murdock .. Feb 28, 2000 ..

Could anything be less predictable and more devastating than a suicidal airplane pilot or giant, killer bonfire logs? Try a suitcase-sized atomic bomb. Better yet, try 84 of them.

According to Congressman Curt Weldon (R - Pennsylvania), the former Soviet Union produced 132 10-kiloton, suitcase nukes. Today, Russia can account for only 48. Where are the other 84? The Clinton-Gore Administration doesn't know and, outrageously, doesn't seem to care.

Many hawks correctly advocate a ballistic missile defense system to protect America from incoming nuclear rockets. These could be launched deliberately or accidentally by Russia, China, Pakistan or by smaller, renegade nations such as North Korea, Iraq or, someday, maybe even Iran. If an ICBM hurtled toward San Diego, Denver or Washington, for instance, Americans could do little more than click on the carnage on CNN.

Equally unacceptable, though likely tougher to combat, would be an atomic device as nondescript as a Samsonite valise. It could be carried down the street, then nonchalantly deposited at the Plaza Hotel's coat check in Manhattan or nestled in the basement of Chicago's Sears Tower. A few hours later, the Big Apple or the Windy City would resemble Hiroshima or Nagasaki in 1945.

This radioactive luggage already could be in the possession of people hostile to the US. Even more worrisome, these atomic bags apparently are on American soil today.

The files of Vassiliy Mitrokhin, the KGB's former chief archivist, offers compelling evidence that this lethal luggage already is here. For over two decades, Mitrokhin hand-copied top-secret Soviet documents at the espionage agency's Moscow headquarters and smuggled his notes out under his clothing after work. He regularly hid these papers beneath his dacha's floor boards. In 1992, he defected to Great Britain with this intelligence bonanza.

Mitrokhin's records indicated that Soviet operatives buried weapons in booby-trapped sites in Switzerland and Belgium in case of conflict. As Rep. Weldon explained on the House floor last October 28: "The Swiss government and the Belgian government dug up these sites, and exactly where the Mitrokhin files said they would be, they found the military hardware that the Soviet Union had placed there without those countries having any idea of what the Soviets had done."

Mitrokhin has corroborated previous claims by Russian General Alexander Lebed, the KGB's one-time top man in London, Oleg Gordievsky, and former high-level military spy Stanislav Lunev. They said that to prepare for possible hostilities with the US, the KGB pre-deployed nuclear suitcases somewhere near Brainerd, Minnesota, in Montana, beside a Texas oil pipeline and adjacent to harbors in California and New York City. Alas, Mitrokhin was unable to capture more specific data.

Has the Administration queried Moscow for the locations of these weapons since they came to light around 1992?

"No, we have not," Pentagon spokesman Rear Admiral Craig Quigley told reporters on September 15. After speaking with three FBI officials, Weldon said, "their answer was that our government has not yet asked the Russian government to give us the exact locations of these sites." Weldon and Rep. James Oberstar (D - Minnesota) jointly wrote Secretary of State Madeleine Albright on October 22 "to inquire whether the United States government has ever asked the Russian government to provide detailed site information on pre-deployed weapons." Incredibly, the congressmen still are waiting for Albright's answer.

"I am outraged that we have not asked that question," Weldon said. "This administration perhaps fears that when we start to dig up all over America locations of equipment that we know have been there for three or perhaps seven years, there are going to be a lot of people in this country who are going to start to ask some very difficult questions of their elected leaders."

The Clinton Administration commits gross negligence every day it fails even to attempt to reduce or eliminate the risks posed by these mini-weapons of mass destruction. White House and State Department officials must get with it and press the Kremlin to identify any suitcase nukes or related instrument stashed in American hideaways. Additionally, any such weapons wandering around Russia should be found and, if necessary, purchased from Moscow and dismantled under international inspection. In terms of non-bang for the buck, this would be a higher-yield investment than next year's entire defense budget.

If the ever-accommodating Bill Clinton and Al Gore do not consider this a grave national security matter, perhaps they would find it motivating to think of nuclear suitcases as a clear and present danger to dozens, even hundreds, of electoral votes.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext