SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)
INTC 43.46-0.1%12:32 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Joe NYC who wrote (143629)9/18/2001 10:09:28 AM
From: fingolfen  Read Replies (1) of 186894
 
Joe,

Okay, let's hit rewind here and hit a few high points first.

I would love nothing better than to believe that America has the power to eliminate the Taliban. That regime is a blight on their country, a blight on the world, and even a blight on their religion. However, if you envision something a la Desert Storm, it's not going to work. I can't remember which general said it, but Afghanistan "sucks as a target." The terrain is rough, the infrastructure is nonexistent. Picture the U.S. army slogging through Northern Italy in World War II... only worse... I do agree that there should be a military response to bin Laden and the Taliban, but airstrikes and a ground assault aren't going to do much good. These people have been at war for 22 years. I picture a more covert series of operations over a longer period of time.

You, however, didn't answer my final questions: Is collateral damage acceptable? Is it okay to take out a few innocents so long as we nail those responsible????
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext