SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : General Magic

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Carbo who started this subject9/18/2001 4:53:18 PM
From: dgurgel  Read Replies (1) of 10081
 
OT: Foreign Comment On Crisis

From: "Michael Gurstein"
To:
Subject: Fw: War to set up a military presence?
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 08:19:09 -0400

INDEPENDENT (London) 18 September 2001
By Robert Fisk

If Bush wants an invasion, it could become more costly than Vietnam

President Bush is talking about a "crusade" it would be difficult
to find a word more likely to enrage Muslims but if he plans to
wage it in Afghanistan, the United States faces a military campaign
more fraught and potentially even more costly than Vietnam.

Ground troops may be necessary to seize Osama bin Laden but they
will be entering a country containing one tenth of the world's land
mines, left by Soviet occupation forces across 80 per cent of the
land.

Besides, anyone who wants to invade Afghanistan needs friends. The
Russians had the communist government of Babrak Karmal. But, with
the murder of the only serious opponent of the Taliban, Shah Masood,
by Arab suicide bombers nine days ago, the United States hasn't a
single friend in that cemetery of foreign armies.

So, are the Americans planning a mere attack by cruise missiles?
They fired 70 missiles at Osama bin Laden's camps after the bombing
of the US embassies in Nairobi and Dar es Salaam they knew where
they were, of course, because the camps were built by the CIA during
the Afghan-Russian war but they did not touch Mr bin Laden. Do they
plan to use special parachute units to descend on the areas around
Kandahar where Mr bin Laden has been known to live in the past?

And what about those mines? If the Americans are even contemplating
a ground force, it can enter only from Pakistan the most dangerous
main supply route it would be possible to find and up the Kabul
Gorge from Jalalabad. But the Russians seeded the perimeters of
Jalalabad, Kandahar, Khost and Herat with anti-armour mines. There
are, in Afghanistan today, more than 10 million mines. They lie in
fields, on mountainsides, beside roads, around the big cities, along
irrigation ditches. On average, between 20 and 25 Afghan men, women
and children are blown up by mines every day even if we take the
lower figure, this indicates 73,000 civilian casualties from these
mines in the past 10 years alone.

A military incursion would, therefore, need an army of mine
clearance specialists as well as soldiers, men who would have to
inch their way over the roughest terrain in the world while under
attack to make the roads and countryside safe for the Americans and
their allies. Of Afghanistan's 29 provinces, 27 are littered with
mines.

During their savage 10-year occupation, the Russians also planted
thousands of mines in "security zones" around Afghanistan's
airports, power stations and government installations. Western
non-governmental organisations working in the country two years ago
estimated that it would cost $1 per mine to clear Afghanistan's 10
million mines and 45 days to clear merely a square mile of land.
There are now two million disabled men, women and children in
Afghanistan. No infantry can march across this territory.

And then there is that main supply route. Pakistan has already made
clear that it will not involve its own military in a campaign,
although there are suspicions that enough money might persuade
General Musharraf now respectfully referred to as President by the
Americans even though he took the presidency illegally to change his
mind. However, the "Jihadi" culture has already impregnated the
Pakistan army and there is a real possibility of unrest turning to
civil war if the Americans arrived to invade Muslim Afghanistan.

The very border areas through which a Western army would have to
pass are held by men loyal to the Taliban. On the Pakistani side of
the frontier, there are now 2,000 Taliban madrassas (schools) where
religious teaching is given not only to potential mujahedin but to
Chechen and Tadjik fighters as well.

The policemen who guard these madrassas constitute a mere facade of
governmental control.

Even if the Americans penetrated Afghanistan, their shells would
only plough over the ruins. The Russians tried to destroy the
Taliban's predecessors with 10 years of bombing, destroying whole
villages, with their people, farm animals, fields, trees and mud
huts. And still they could not get rid of the mujahedin, still they
could not to use Mr Bush's inappropriately folksy phrase "smoke them
out of their holes".

With Pakistan as its only, broken ally among Afghan-istan's
neighbours, with no friends inside the country and 10 million hidden
land mines lying across its mountains and fields and cities, Mr
Bush's "crusade" looks more than dangerous. We are now being told
that the United States is no longer afraid to take casualties.
America, the President says, will have to accept losses. He'd better
be right.

======================

*** NOTICE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this
material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a
prior interest in receiving the included information for research
and educational purposes. Feel free to distribute widely but PLEASE
acknowledge the original source. ***
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext