SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: marginmike who wrote (123691)9/19/2001 11:44:53 AM
From: patron_anejo_por_favor  Read Replies (1) of 436258
 
<<Its not the insurence co's fault that the FAA has its head up its ass>>

While it's not their "fault", they are in the business of assessing risk, no? The buildings were a target of previous attacks and ongoing threats. Therefore the premiums they charged should have reflected it, as should their reserves. Also, they'll benefit going forward from higher premiums charged to everyone else. They do not need, and should not get a DIME of taxpayers money.

And while its not the insurers fault, sadly the same can not be said for the airlines, who put pressure constantly on the FAA to reduce security measures. They get NO sympathy from me at all in this.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News