Wexler, is there anything you would not find negative?
Given that the military is likely to be upgrading its equipment, why can't a company like InspecTech look to see if it can get a piece of the action by putting new features on military planes?
If Boeing said something like that, would you find a negative?
You owe a huge apology to REFR. Besides NOT being a stock fraud, it did not say what you said. A licensee, InspecTech, has a license that allows it to sell SPD-related items to anyone it wants. It can sell to private planes, commercial or military. It is free to find customers and sell and REFR gets 10%. So, if InspecTech puts out a press release, blame them, not REFR. Of course, they are a real company (private) that makes money at what they do and is not a fraud, either.
So, I applaud their explaining some of the opportunities they are looking at. Since SPD film can be attached to many things, putting it on bulletproof glass is no big stretch.
Why not admit that until you cover your short, you will attack ANYTHING about REFR that you think means anything, even at the risk of making yourself look like a fool.
Note, unlike you, I measure a stock by more than the temporary stock price caused by manipulation in a uniquely horrible stock market. On over a quarter million shares today, your friends were not able to knock it down as much as I bet you want. Since I bought more and will not sell, I think I will come out far ahead of you since the idea of a fraud is in your head, not in reality.
Further, I expect much more from InspecTech that this press release only hinted at.
Funny how Asensio has not felt like a rapid response yet. You, on the other hand, do not need to run your words by a lawyer first, yet.
Maybe I should thank you guys for helping me lower my average cost. |
