Football Forum (NFL) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Football Forum (NFL)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Carolyn who wrote (6602)	9/21/2001 8:51:53 PM
From: Tom C	Read Replies (1) of 45639

I have no problem with Annette being allowed to start at 0-0 as long as we define the winner as the one who picks the most winners and not base it on winning percentage. In other words someone who goes 10-6 would win over someone who goes 9-0. This has an advantage, if you forget to play one week you are not automatically out but you are going to have a harder time winning. Either way, I'll take Miami. The 2001 NFL Challenge Week 3 (Since week 2 was blown up $#$?#%$) Copy, Paste and add your pick! ____________________________________ Game - Oakland + 1 1/2 @ Miami ____________________________________ Standings ____________________________________ 1. Carolyn - 0-1--------------Raiders 2. Gloop - 0-1 ------------Miami 3. Jeff Roberts - 1-0 4. Stoctrash - 0-1 5. DSpetry - 1-0 <--------- RAIDERSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS 6. Lost1 - 1-0 7. Bill - 0-1 -----Miami 8. Sandintoes - 0-1 9. OMD - 1-0 --------Miami 10 Sarkie - 0-1 11. Ish - 0-1------------Miami 12. Master - 0-1 13. TomC - 1-0 _________Miami 14. RobertFNewton - 1-0 15. Annette - 0-1-------Miami

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next