SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials
AMAT 259.15+1.1%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: w0z who wrote (53081)9/25/2001 10:49:05 AM
From: Sun Tzu  Read Replies (1) of 70976
 
I am not blind to the points Stan and you make. In the version of the story that I heard, the people and the pilot refused to fly with the person on board. There is no excuse for that. It could have been "reasonable" under the circumstances to check for the id and do a search to make sure he was not carrying any weapons. As I understand it, they did just that but kept the passenger in the airport for questioning, despite everything being in order. There is no excuse for that. Once it was established there is no reason to assume he is more of threat than anyone else on board, any further "investigation" purely based on his ethnicity was just racism. It would have been wise of the pilot and the airport authorities to calm the passengers' fears and announce that they have verified there is no threat from the gentleman. Then they should have moved on to apologize to him for the inconvenience and for their manners. Part of the responsibility of being in charge is that unlike the public, you are not allowed to panic and disregard all rules and reason. What defines us all is not how we behave in normal times, but how much grace we show under pressure.

ST
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext