SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials
AMAT 256.41+1.1%Dec 19 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Gottfried who wrote (53123)9/25/2001 2:40:40 PM
From: Jacob Snyder  Read Replies (3) of 70976
 
Will it?

The government has suddenly gone back to the attitude that, for every problem, there is a government program that can solve it, if enough money is thrown at it. We already spend more on "Intelligence" than any other country, by a very wide margin. I, too, heard the story about the old computers.

IMO, what's needed (in general, and in particular for our "Intelligence" agencies) is a kick in the butt, not being handed more money. What's needed is reorganization, a focus on results rather than process. I'd say we need motivation too, but I think CNN has done that for every American, in the last 2 weeks.

A lot of the organizational boundaries (between domestic and foreign, civilian vs. military) are obsolete. And, frankly, there is a lot of deadwood, a lot of fat, lazy, complacent institutions.

Our Intelligence people need to get out from behind their computers in comfortable Virginia suburbs. They need to be out in the field, go to dirty dangerous places like Uzbekistan and Oman, looking and listening, or directly supervising those who are looking and listening. There will be a lot of institutional resistance to this.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext