SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Donkey's Inn

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Mephisto who started this subject9/25/2001 3:39:10 PM
From: Kenneth E. Phillipps  Read Replies (2) of 15516
 
Justices to rule on school vouchers

Supreme Court more conservative than last time it ruled


ASSOCIATED PRESS

WASHINGTON, Sept. 25 — The Supreme Court agreed Tuesday to decide whether school voucher programs like those favored by the Bush administration are a constitutional use of taxpayer money. The court said it will hear three related cases arising from a program that provides tuition aid to parents of nearly 4,000 students who have left public schools in Cleveland that their parents felt were failing.

















‘It will be a historic showdown over government funding of religion.’
— BARRY LYNN
Americans United for the Separation of Church and State LOWER COURTS reached opposite conclusions about whether the program is unconstitutional government promotion of religion.
A high court ruling is expected by June.
The Ohio program offers the justices an opportunity for a broad ruling on a long-simmering political issue that generally pits social conservatives and some inner-city parents against civil liberties groups and teachers’ unions.
“This is a huge day for the kids in Cleveland and all over the country. We’re delighted that the Supreme Court will finally have a chance to remove the constitutional cloud from school choice,” said Clint Bolick, vice president of the Institute for Justice, a liberatrian law firm that represents Cleveland families in the program.
Sandra Feldman, president of the American Federation of Teachers union, countered that support for vouchers would undermine public schools. “There is going to be more of a strain on public resources than ever,” in the wake of the Sept. 11 twin terrorist attacks, she said, “and we think it would be just wrong to spend those resources on private and religious schools.”

WHITE HOUSE WEIGHS IN


School vouchers were a centerpiece of President Bush’s education platform during his campaign, and his top Supreme Court lawyer filed an uninvited friend-of-the-court brief urging the justices to take on the Cleveland dispute.
Solicitor General Theodore Olson argued that the Cleveland program is constitutional, because it provides the same amount of cash help to students no matter whether they enroll in church-run schools or nonreligious private academies.
Vouchers, also called school choice programs, allow parents to take children out of public schools and use government subsidies to pay all or some of the tuition bill at a private or religious school.
Supporters say vouchers give children who want to learn a way out of hectic or dangerous public schools, while giving parents power over school bureaucracies. Opponents, including most congressional Democrats, say vouchers steal precious public money from the schools that need it most.
Although vouchers remain an ideological touchstone for many conservatives, there was not enough Republican support for vouchers when Congress recently passed a sweeping education reform package. Leaders shelved the idea temporarily.
Those who oppose vouchers on constitutional grounds say they are a clear violation of the guarantee that government will not promote or “establish” religion.
Americans United for the Separation of Church and State called vouchers the most important church-state case in 50 years.
“It will be a historic showdown over government funding of religion,” said Barry Lynn, the group’s executive director.

PAST COURT ACTIONS
The court last ruled on vouchers directly in 1973, when it struck down a school voucher program because some public money was used to “subsidize and advance the religious mission of sectarian schools.”
The court has become more conservative since then, and it has allowed pro-voucher decisions from lower courts to stand.
The current nine justices have declined previous invitations to rule on voucher or tuition programs in Wisconsin, Maine and Vermont, even as they allowed more government aid to religious schools for things like computers and remedial tutoring.
As in Ohio, lower courts across the country have divided over whether spending tax money on religious education is an unconstitutional violation of the separation between church and state.
The Ohio Pilot Project Scholarship Program provides tuition vouchers to kindergartners through eighth-graders enrolled in city schools. The money, up to $2,500 per child annually, can be used at private or parochial schools that sign up for the program and meet its requirements. Low-income families get preference.
Of the 3,700 students enrolled in the program, 96 percent attend religious schools.
The Ohio Supreme Court approved of the program, but the federal courts struck it down.
The cases are Zelman v. Simmons-Harris, 00-1751; Hanna Perkins School v. Simmons-Harris, 00-1777; and Taylor v. Simmons-Harris, 00-1779.

© 2001 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext