SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting
QCOM 177.78-2.2%Jan 9 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: A.J. Mullen who wrote (15225)9/26/2001 8:37:58 AM
From: Art Bechhoefer  Read Replies (2) of 197156
 
Ashley, I should have been more explicit in distinguishing between potential adverse effects from analog compared with digital, particularly CDMA. My intent was to argue that if there are adverse effects from exposure to electromagnetic radiation (a big if), then they are likely to be far more pronounced with analog than with CDMA. That's because, as I understand it, a CDMA transmission is essentially a series of minute pulses, whereas analog is continuous. Even if one assumed the RF power output was the same in both analog and CDMA, the total AMOUNT of power to which the person speaking into a handset would be exposed would be far less with CDMA.

The main issue, of course, is whether one can find a causal relationship between exposure to electromagnetic radiation and headaches, tumors, or whatever. I argue simply that if the research involved some cases using analog and some using CDMA, and no control between the two systems, it would be fundamentally flawed. I have seen no research reports that were based solely on CDMA, or even digital transmissions. If there are any, so much the better.

Art
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext