SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 203.14-0.8%Jan 9 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: wanna_bmw who wrote (56711)9/30/2001 8:04:13 AM
From: milo_moraiRead Replies (2) of 275872
 
Your wrong here wanna

"I agree in some respects. Benchmarking at low resolutions is pretty irrelevant to the user experience, but so is showing a game running at 150 fps on one platform vs 175fps on another. Extremely high frame rates like these exceed the ability of the monitor and/or video adapter, anyway, and does not make much of a difference when it comes to the user experience."

High Frame rates and more Powerful CPU's do affect user experience especially in Multiplayer games. I've seen framerates drop from 100fps down to 35fps on Multiplayer games (I play mostly para-military type games) when more people are in the same field of view, and the number of sounds increase as more people are firing, footsteps etc. Not to mention increased TCP/IP traffic that has to be handled from the Server to the Client.

The faster the CPU the smoother Multiplayer games are, thus adding to the realism of said game. And I can say my 850Mhz Athlon cannot go above 800x600 without my gameplay starting to suffer and I have 3000Kbps Cable Modem connection.

So don't put words into Gamers Mouths please.

M.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext