Americans 4 "No Own - No Sell" Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Americans 4 "No Own - No Sell"

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: peter michaelson who wrote (79)	10/1/2001 2:15:42 PM
From: joseph krinsky	Read Replies (2) of 455

Shorters always focus too much on individual stocks and situations when the shorting argument comes up. IMO-It's really unimportant about slph or any other specific stock. What's important is whether or not the methods etc etc are legal, and should be allowed or modified. I disagree with your claim that you're(pl) not using collusion (and/or manipulation) to drive down stock prices, but I am not John Reed Stark, so it doesn't really matter. Saying the stock price of any given stock deserves to be higher or lower, scam or not, is subjective. I agree that what your group does is well known to the authorities, but not having been fined or subjected to sanctions so far, shouldn't lead anyone to draw any premature conclusions. LOL. RE your P.S.: I was wondering why any of the shorters would post on this thread about it, btw..it seems that the thread is really a vehicle to promote a petition and the petition''s goal, and so what's there really to argue about? You're either for it, and you sign... or you're against it, and you don't sign. Or you're not interested and you ignore the whole matter.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next