SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Nokia Corp. (NOK)
NOK 6.775+4.3%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Puck who wrote (1398)10/1/2001 3:07:41 PM
From: carranza2  Read Replies (1) of 9255
 
I believe he claimed that CDMA technology in real world conditions was only 1 to 1.5 times as efficient as CDMA, which in his mind meant that very marginal spectral efficieny [sic] that CDMA might offer wasn't worth the price of deviating from GSM's worldwide economy. I've never quite been able to reconcile his statements

I've tried but I can't reconcile those statements, either.

I think CDMA is at least as efficient as CDMA, but I don't know. I'd be very interested in anything that's 1.5 times as efficient as itself.

What does "GSM's worldwide economy" mean? Interesting choice of words.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext