Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM)

QCOM 154.12

-3.3%

3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: qveauriche who wrote (105731)	10/1/2001 8:02:26 PM
From: carranza2	Read Replies (1) of 152472

Thanks for posting that article. It's interesting to see that at least some part of the British populace sees things clearly. It's easy to ridicule those who detest Clinton. While he may have been a mediocre President with respect to domestic affairs, he was an utter failure in the foreign and national security arenas. The WTC and Pentagon incidents could have occurred even if Clinton had been more conscious of national security concerns. Perhaps, however, they may not have, and he'll have to live with the possibility that his inaction led to thousands of deaths. Don't for a minute think it will bother him. His soul has been cheapened by living his life as a permanent political campaign since he was 18 years old. If you think he was bad, get ready for a serious Presidential bid on Hillary's part. If you think he was an ineffective leader in the foreign and national security fields, pray and hope that she doesn't gets elected. For anyone with an interest in seeing what kind of President she would make, I highly recommend the Barbara Olson book, Hell To Pay. She's a slick, corrupt, incredibly ambitious harridan whose Presidency would be a disaster for the U.S.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next