Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN)

AMZN 229.12

-0.2%

Nov 26 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Skeeter Bug who wrote (132310)	10/2/2001 12:06:07 AM
From: schrodingers_cat	Read Replies (1) of 164684

It will never be practical to surgically target the "whoop *ss" , and if you insist on this then the terrorists will not be destroyed. In Kosovo the kind of surgical targeting that we did placed major restrictions on our military, and even then many civilians and even Chinese diplomats were killed, so it was hardly "surgically targeted." If killing civilians is unacceptable then that rules out fighting a war or any military action. If our strategy is to win the support of the Afghan people in our pursuit of bin Laden, then we must limit their casualties, but some "innocent civilian" deaths are inevitable. I think there is a difference between targeting non-combatants and killing them while targeting someone else. Maybe the point that you were trying to make was that we should not target non-combatants?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next