SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : War
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Tom Clarke who wrote (5702)10/2/2001 11:35:12 AM
From: GUSTAVE JAEGER  Read Replies (1) of 23908
 
So far, I've got the same tentative scenario that I elaborated on with Emile:
Message 16426794

Furthermore, we should also keep in mind that Masood was close to the Iranians and could easily switch partners and become the US's point man in Afghanistan... Of course, the fact that Masood was not Pashtun wouldn't have helped but then, the momentum of Masood's thrust toward Kabul would have been totally different were he still be alive. All the blame for the US terrorist attacks would have been put on the Taleban all the same BUT Masood would have appeared as the providential man --with the EU's backing on top of that...
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News