SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)
INTC 43.75+0.6%Dec 3 3:59 PM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: maui_dude who wrote (144576)10/2/2001 2:42:57 PM
From: tcmay  Read Replies (3) of 186894
 
"Your information is outdated. To push your sabbatical at intel beyond 12 months require special permission from a GM or higher. The policy changed about 5 years ago. Managers insists (in extremely large percentage of cases) to not delay sabbaticals."

Now you are changing your claim. You originally claimed that sabbaticals had to be taken "immediately"...now you say they can and are delayed by up to a year without a GM approval.

I didn't claim otherwise. I said the claim that they had to be taken "immediately" was bogus. You now are claiming that delays of up to a year are possible without GM approval, which is the same delay I said was fairly common. Learning to back pedal, eh?

And I'll bet dollars to Athlons that delays of sabbaticals so as not to impinge on project schedules is _encouraged_, even now. I have a hard time imagining an engineer taking off for 6-8 weeks in the midst of a critical design or process transfer.

But, again, I was disputing your lame "must be taken immediately" point. My claim was that "Many people delayed their sabbaticals by a year, even more."

Now that you have changed your claim to "To push your sabbatical at intel beyond 12 months require special permission from a GM or higher." I guess arguing with you was pointless from the gitgo.

Weasels like you should be taken out and shot.

--Tim May
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News