Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)

AMD 214.18

-0.5%

Dec 31 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Elmer who wrote (56962)	10/3/2001 12:26:26 AM
From: fyodor_	Read Replies (1) of 275872

Elmer: I didn't bring up the subject or post the section of the California code but it does seem to fit. It seems pretty clear there is an intent to mislead if not outright defraud. And conspiracy to defraud is a crime as well... This is such a classic case of F.U.D. it hurts. (is the P in "EP" still short for Phud?) PR ratings have been done plenty of times before. AMD is not claiming the processor runs at a higher frequency than it actually does, they have simply decided not to supply the operating frequency, but rather a model number to more easily allow the customers to gauge the performance. As long as they don't stick a "MHz" on their Model #s, AMD is untouchable on this. -fyo

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next