SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Greg or e who wrote (30735)10/3/2001 12:03:30 PM
From: thames_sider  Read Replies (1) of 82486
 
Can there be any "wrong ways" if there are no "Right ways"?
Yes. Some ways are clearly far worse than others.
Example: one way of ending all war on earth would be to destroy the planet.
Hopefully even you would agree that this is 'wrong' - or at least among the worst possible ways...

Was the attack on the WTC, just one "Valid" expression among many?
I would say it was a vile and wrong act. I presume you, as nearly all the civilised world, would agree.
Osama bin Laden evidently thinks it was right, and entirely justified by the terms of his faith.
It doesn't matter (to him) that we think it wrong - he thought it was right, and therefore valid, and it was planned and carried out at his behest. After all, it must be good because the word of his God makes it so.

Of course, he may well think it's wrong that the West now plans to see the Taliban overthrown, his organisation destroyed, and himself rot for a very, very long time in incarceration to reflect on the error of his ways... (ideally with endless 24/7 loops of the 700 Show to brighten his time <g>).
Whereas I think this is entirely right. And much more civilised, lingering and unpleasant for him than a quick and easy death.

These things are relative, yes?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext