International Precious Metals (IPMCF) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Furry Otter who wrote (13277)	6/24/1997 1:01:00 AM
From: Steve Huskey	of 35569

<<waiting for the BD report before any more PRs...>> I see I still haven't gotten to the essence of my concerns about this. So... the real wildcard here and risk, IMO, is the fire assay by some heretofore unheard of third party. Now admit it, weren't you surprised by this. It came out of nowhere. Now if it had BD's or Lyco's initials on it, everyone would have nodded. But it didn't. The initial surprise was overcome by us longs who looked at the nice numbers the fire assay came up with. I'm not so sure the market would be so understanding. Or the exchanges. What if the exchange decided to halt the stock for good... pending "verification"? How would you feel then? Trapped!!! Only the company knows what they have and from whom. If they dont release info now, maybe it's for the best. That's all I'm saying. They shouldn't try to drum up a PR just to try and satisfy nervous investors if they are better off waiting a little while for something they feel comfortable disclosing. Steve

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next