SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 214.18-0.5%Dec 31 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: TimF who wrote (57058)10/3/2001 4:19:08 PM
From: milo_moraiRead Replies (2) of 275872
 
Tim it was even worse comparing a 386SX to a 386DX as the 386SX was still a 16 bit cpu whereas the 386DX was true 32 bit.

a 386SX performed like a 286. I was pissed about my 386SX when I got it as it was slow.

M.


Processor Winstone Value
--------------------------------------------------
386/25MHz Winstone base w/4MB 10.20
386/25MHz Winstone base w/8MB 13.60
486/25MHz 26.32
CxS40 29.95*
486/33MHz 34.32
SLC2/50 36.70*
SLC2/66 37.80*
AMD40 40.30*
486DX2/50MHz 43.50
486/50MHz 47.94
486DX2/66MHz 50.68
Pentium 73.30
CX486DRx2/50 14.20 --
Rev to 486 2/50 15.40 Rev to 486 3/75 18.00

Keep in mind these could vary alot
486/Now! 11.20 / depending what system the upgrade
MCMaster 50PD/8 15.00 -- is going into (ie MCMaster was
only tested on a 386SX16 machine
and the rest a Compaq 386DX/25e
with only 4MB and with 8MB the
Rev to 486 2/50 did 23 Winstones
and the 486/33 did 36. So with
more memory and better peripherals
the upgrades should give truer 486
performance despite PC Magazines
slams against them in general.

computercraft.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext