SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 213.43+6.2%Dec 19 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: fyodor_ who wrote (57146)10/4/2001 10:06:12 AM
From: Mary CluneyRead Replies (2) of 275872
 
fyodor,<<<There is a standard way of measuring frequency, yes. There is not, however, a standard way of rating computer chips in terms of frequency.>>>

I'm with John. I'm totally confused by the explanations. But, in reality, we aren't the only one's that are confused.

IMO there should only be one rated speed, eg, the standard way of measuring the highest frequency of the processor.

The effective speed of the processor is something entirely different.

There the techies can apply all the spin their imagination can come up with and endlessly debate the issue.

It's like horsepower for a car. I don't know the difference between 350 vs 250. The speed of the car depends on size, weight, shape and a lot of other variables.

You could also argue that it depends on the skill of a driver. All I know is I want as much horse power as I can afford (more or less).

Mary
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext