SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 231.83+1.7%Jan 16 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (57217)10/5/2001 10:06:12 AM
From: that_crazy_dougRead Replies (1) of 275872
 
<< so because the truth sometimes lies, you have to lie to tell the truth? >>

Do you think AMD would have come out with the PR system if the P4 performed on a clock per clock basis equivilent to an athlon or p3?

The fact that the p4 loses a non trivial amount of benchmarks to machines running at 30%-50% lower speed make it a much bigger farse then anything AMD is doing. An AMD 1800 chip will outperform the p4 1.8ghz chip, so why complain about the naming convention? If the performance wasn't there, I'd be the first to agree, but the performance is there, and it wasn't AMD that devalued the mhz.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext