Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: FaultLine who wrote (2845)	10/5/2001 7:08:29 PM
From: LTK007	Read Replies (3) of 281500

a question i think that must be addressed when talking Nuclear weapons and that is exactly what is the destructive range and fall-out of the SMALLEST strategic nuclear device--i don't have the answer--anyone? any nuclear weapon that engulphs the innocent is morally unacceptable,and the U.S. would end up having to blow up the rest of the world to fight off the hatred it would justly inspire in others. I state this as a man who also after prolonged study of Truman's decision regards ending WWII,do not judge him,and sympathize with his reasoning. But i also remind,when some yahoo yells "you know what Truman would do!"--i remind that Truman fired MacArthur for his wanting to use Nuclear bombs in Korea. Max

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next