SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 231.83+1.7%Jan 16 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: TGPTNDR who wrote (57499)10/6/2001 9:58:07 PM
From: wanna_bmwRead Replies (4) of 275872
 
TGPTNDR, my only point in this, which I think has been lost, is to dispel the silly rumor that Athlon XP has model numbers based on how much faster it is than the Athlon (sans XP). While the theory that Athlon XP model numbers were based on performance over the current Athlon sounded like a good point to begin with, a quick check of Athlon MP benchmarks with respect to a similarly clocked Athlon show less than 5% performance gains on many applications.

In terms of model numbers over megahertz, the Athlon XP 1500+ is rated 12.5% greater than the core frequency, while the Athlon XP 1800+ is rated 17.5% greater than the core frequency. Clearly, they are not being modeled after the difference between Palomino and Thunderbird cores, unless AMD has only a small set of SSE enhanced benchmarks that show the Athlon XP getting huge improvements over their previous generation.

It seems reasonable to me that the model ratings are simply meant to show the Athlon XP as performing closer to the Pentium 4, without seeming too presumptuous. Then again, I also agree with others on this board that think that arbitrary model numbers are a bad idea, simply because of this fact that they are arbitrary, and not based on any concrete standard of measurement.

wanna_bmw
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext