SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 231.83+1.7%Jan 16 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: wanna_bmw who wrote (57533)10/6/2001 10:06:16 PM
From: kapkan4uRead Replies (1) of 275872
 
<In terms of model numbers over megahertz, the Athlon XP 1500+ is rated 12.5% greater than the core frequency, while the Athlon XP 1800+ is rated 17.5% greater than the core frequency. Clearly, they are not being modeled after the difference between Palomino and Thunderbird cores>

Check the SPECint2000 difference between Athlon and XP at the same frequency. The advantage is about 15% and grows with frequency due to hardware prefetch of XP. So 12.5% for 1500+ and 17.5% for 1800+ makes sense to me.

Kap
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext