SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 231.83+1.7%Jan 16 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: wanna_bmw who wrote (57533)10/6/2001 11:00:25 PM
From: jcholewaRead Replies (1) of 275872
 
> a quick check of Athlon MP benchmarks with respect to a
> similarly clocked Athlon show less than 5% performance
> gains on many applications.
> Athlon XP 1500+ is rated 12.5% greater than the core
> frequency, while the Athlon XP 1800+ is rated 17.5%
> greater than the core frequency. Clearly, they are not
> being modeled after the difference between Palomino and
> Thunderbird cores

I believe that your argument here is not logically sound (even though your conclusion is realistic). On most applications, performance does not scale well in most applications. A 5% improvement is not completely unrealistic for a 12.5% boost in frequency. And it is always conceivable (though not proven) that the advantage of the Palomino over the Thunderbird will increase at higher frequencies.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext