SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)
INTC 41.41+2.2%Dec 5 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Dan3 who wrote (144852)10/7/2001 1:13:18 PM
From: wanna_bmw  Read Replies (1) of 186894
 
Dan, Re: Itanium IA-32 performance

If you really think that Itanium will be positioned to run IA-32 code, you're really more lost than I thought.

Itanium, for the next couple years at least, is being positioned for the enterprise server market, primarily the 4- and 8-way space used in back-end processing. These segments make use of database, security, and data transfer applications. SQL Server, Oracle, and others have already been fully ported to IA-64.

Other uses for IA-64 is for high end workstations, because of its massive floating point power. Expect 1- or 2-way Itanium workstations to be popular for rendering farms or scientific studies. Lightwave, SoftImage, Maya, and others have already been ported to IA-64. Many scientific applications have been built from the ground up for IA-64.

Admittedly, the uses for Itanium are small right now. With the performance of McKinley, things will grow and expand. With the lower power dissipation of Deerfield and the added cache of Madison, it will grow even still. More applications are being ported or created for IA-64. Just check out the press releases, and you'll soon see that no one would need to run an IA-32 app on their Itanium server (though at least the capability is there for anyone who absolutely requires it).

wanna_bmw
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext