International Precious Metals (IPMCF) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Dan Martin who wrote (13351)	6/24/1997 12:17:00 PM
From: Proton	of 35569

Re: Expectations and Assays From Dan: I have a tough time understanding what it is people expect from this company at times. It seems to me that they give us some info then we get this barrage of questions about why they don't confirm this or release that. Let's allow them to do their work at their pace not ours! Amen! Amen! Amen! Financial speculation can be rewarding. Verbal speculation is usually just onanistic. Witness the recent descent into Waterworld. :-) From today's press release: *Additionally, IPM is delighted to announce that it has received the results of a standard fire assay performed by AuRIC on head grade samples of Black Rock material.* I had not realized AuRIC had performed fire assays! This isn't decisively good news, but it is good news. I am confused by the second table in today's press release (fire assay results). The column for drill holes seems to have numbers and letters (PD = palladium?). Also, while I can infer what the numbers mean, I don't see a any indication on the table of what they are. May I get some help on this, please? Pý

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next