S100,
<< Oh No, missing links, we feel your pain. Any idea on what is missing? >>
Yes.
Most of the files are on my drive.
Obsolete links in some cases are in my (or others) posts to "Qualcomm - News Only".
<< You do remember to save to disk? >>
With Qualcomm, you betcha.
With Nokia, sometimes for easy organized access, but they do an excellent job of archival on their server.
I thought the web was for storage and all we needed was a thin client? <g>
<< 3G-1x Trials ... actual rate 135 ... right out in the open not behind the "Green Door".
Actual WHAT rate? In some desert with a single user perched beneath a microwave tower?
Good Qualcomm supplied data (although obviously not in a commercial environment which is why thy say 'theoretical" with some steel canyons, natural canyons, hills and forests and the obligatory desert) for 1xEV-DO in slide 4:
newamerica.net
Certainly quite different average user rate than the (Qualcomm) Ovum whitepaper which says:
1xEV-DO achieves 2.4 Mbps peak rates in a real "commercial" fixed environment with average throughput of 1.4 Mbps and average mobile throughput of 880 Kbps.
<< Just because Nokirola can not seem to get a grip on CDMA does not mean that CDMA is bad. >>
Question for a quiz:
Nokia, Sony, Motorola all manufactured cdmaOne handsets with nonQualcomm chips to standards developed by Qualcomm. All worked fine in a cdmaOne environment. Qualcomm developed the 1xRTT standard. Nokia, Sony, Motorola legacy handsets all have problems with synch channel in 1xRTT. Does this mean:
a.) CDMA Sucks
B.) CDMA Standards Suck
C.) Qualcomm Placed Land Mines
D.) Only Qualcomm can make a CDMA Chip
E.) Nokia, Sony, Motorola, are nitwits
F.) Nokia, Sony, Motorola, are CDMA nitwits
G.) All of the Above
H.) None of the above
Best,
- Eric - |
