Sharks in the Septic Tank Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: E who wrote (31743)	10/10/2001 4:13:08 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) of 82486

I could probably imagine quite a few low tech terrorism threats myself. (for that matter the hijackers where a pretty low tech threat, they stole jet aircraft but there weapons where small blades). I just feel that the fact that one threat exists shouldn't keep us from protecting against another. A lot of the debate is probably questions about the facts as much as it is ideology or disagreement about goals. I''m sure most opponents of missile defense would be for it if it turns out it cost $5 bil. a year and provides a near perfect shield and most proponents of missile defense would be against it if it turns out it will cost $200 bil. a year or more and can't even reliably shoot down attacks by single missiles. The truth will presumably be somewhere in between, but the question of where in that range is an important one. I was just listening to the radio while I was at lunch. Some woman called in talking about a Muslim kid at school who insisted that George Bush was going to Afghanistan to kill all of the Muslims and that all the death and suffering in New York didn't matter much because they were getting millions of dollars in disaster relief. It's sad that some kids are taught to think like that. Tim

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next