Amati investors Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Amati investors

AMTX 1.470

-5.8%

Dec 12 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: pat mudge who wrote (20311)	6/24/1997 3:18:00 PM
From: MangoBoy	of 31386

[more stuff] <<I am referring to Alcatel's own chip which I understand has power problems, among others. I heard this first-hand from Head of Operations/NEC/Australia. This confirmed what JS had said at the annual meeting when he said Alcatel needed Amati's engineers to help with their chip. He was not any more specific than that. As for Mietec, is their chip in use now? If so, what is the response?>> First off, the Meitec chipset is the ALA chipset. Your statement reads as it they're two different chipsets. Second, If AMTX helped ALA then its safe to assume that ALA's chips are OK now since AMTX has the best ADSL engineers in the world. Too bad ALA hasn't reciprocated by signing a licensing agreement in a timely manner. Third, give CSCO some credit for doing due diligence and researching the quality of ALA's chipsets before partnering. CSCO wouldn't foist "no good" technology on their customers. Chambers is smarter than that. I'm not saying that Mietec's chips are or ever will be better than CG or the C6X by all metrics, but they seem to be good enough that CSCO is comfortable putting the CSCO name on products that use 'em.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next