SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Iomega - A Civil Discussion
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Cogito who wrote (1770)6/24/1997 5:28:00 PM
From: D.J.Smyth   of 1908
 
so, Allen, love to here your take on IOM's action today, i've tended to follow a hybrid version of the MACD oscillation, but enjoy reading your posts. what do you think of the Forbes article which came out yesterday over the internet? i discounted the article, but obviously, some in the market did not. a recent survey of Forbes stock writers revealed that only one out of the lot had every bought an individual stock, and very few had purchased even mutual funds. it's odd that these writers consitently quote the same short (Rick Berry - who has been negative on IOM on the way up from $2 to $53 and negative on the way down) and rarely interview what i would consider credible sources. our firm followed one of Berry's picks when he was with Murphy Marsailles and we lost money.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News