Sharks in the Septic Tank Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Poet who wrote (32939)	10/15/2001 2:15:13 AM
From: Lazarus_Long	Read Replies (1) of 82486

(if there were any) Selective blindness on both sides? :-) Clinton had the sense to listen to Greenspan and other advisors about the effect that low interest rates and no budget deficits would have on the economy. He gets credit for that. But Ronnie should get credit for making that possible. It was his craziness (like a fox) about Star Wars that forced the Soviets into an arms race that burned out their economic engine and forced Gorbachev into perestroika in an attempt to get more out of the creaking hulk. When that spun out of control, eastern Europe bolted and the USSR came unglued. And I figured you wouldn't have any problem with a female president....just as long as she's to the right of Genghis Khan. -g Well I told you who I would consider acceptable. Is Margaret Thatcher still alive? Maybe we could amend the Constitution. :-) I thought Clinton was a good President. I hated what he did with Lewinsky, hated even more his smarmy coverup of it, but to let that overshadow his Presidency is not right, IMO. And that's the difference. To me that's like saying Tricky Dick (can I use that instead of his real name?) was OK except for some questionable judgements about handling Watergate.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next